Pure IP Provider Rankings: AWS/Google Cloud's Real-World Stability List

Real-world scenarios of cloud service provider proxy IP stability real test

In the recent six months we have continuously tested the proxy IP services of AWS and Google Cloud in our e-commerce data collection project. In the tests simulating real business scenarios (100,000+ requests in a single day), we found that the performance of the two service providers differed significantly in different business scenarios. With test nodes deployed in Frankfurt, Singapore, and Sao Paulo, we recorded connection success data at different times of the day and under different protocols.

Test environment configuration:

- Request type: HTTPS long connection + short connection mixed mode
- Frequency of testing: 1 availability test every 15 minutes
- Timeout setting: 3 seconds to determine connection failure

Real-world performance of AWS proxy IPs

During the test cycle, which lasted 30 days, AWS's residential IP resources demonstratedCharacteristics of regionalized fluctuations. The European node maintains a connection success rate of more than 921 TP3T during local time zone working hours (9:00-18:00), but the success rate plummets to 671 TP3T when accessing Asian resources across continents.The test data shows that there are obvious region-bound characteristics of its IP resources, which are suitable for the need toFixed area business scenariosof users.

In particular, it is important to note that AWS's HTTP proxy has pitfalls in request header characterization. Our test script has a 23% probability of triggering the target website's security verification mechanism after 30 consecutive requests. This is directly related to the high reuse of its IP resources.

Google Cloud Proxy IP hiding issues

Google Cloud's global node distribution appears to be balanced, but real-world testing reveals that itsMixed types of IP resourcesThe issue. In the test on the Tokyo node, there were 411 TP3T proxy IPs identified as data center IPs, which is a deviation from the officially claimed residential proxy attributes. These types of IPs directly trigger the access restriction mechanism when accessing certain specific websites.

Of interest is the performance of its IPv6 proxy resources. In the IPv6 test conducted at the Frankfurt node, Google Cloud achieved a connection success rate of 98.3%, but the actual data transfer rate fluctuated greatly (50-300KB/s). This instability is risky for business scenarios that require stable transmission.

Advanced Solutions for Business Level Agents

In the comparison test, theipipgoof the global residential IP pool demonstrates better adaptability. Its originalDynamic Route Optimization SystemCan automatically match business scenarios:
- Automatically enables fast response channels for high frequency short connection requirements
- Automatic allocation of low-latency routes for long-connectivity services
- Manually configurable port mapping rules for special protocol requirements

The actual test data shows that under the same test environment, ipipgo's mixed protocol support capability increases the average connection success rate to 95%+. Its IP resources cover 90 million+ real home network nodes, effectively avoiding the risk of data center IP identification. It should be specially noted that itsIntelligent Session Holding TechnologyLong duration session maintenance can be achieved by traffic characterization obfuscation without changing IPs.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: How should I choose between a dynamic IP and a static IP?

A: High-frequency business is recommended to use dynamic IP pool to avoid the risk of blocking, long-term monitoring of business is recommended to choose a static residential IP. ipipgo supports two modes of free switching, and provides real-time switching recommendations.

Q: How to test the real stability of proxy IP?

A: It is recommended to build a three-node monitoring system (different service providers + different regions) to record the following core indicators:
- Connection success rate per 15 minutes
- Number of times the same IP is reused
- Completeness of protocol support
ipipgo users can call their API directly to get real-time quality reports.

Q: What should I do if I encounter specific site restrictions?

A: provided by ipipgoCustomized Fingerprint Obfuscation SolutionsIn this way, we can match the characteristics of proxy traffic with enterprise browsers by modifying 23 characteristic parameters, such as TCP window size and SSL fingerprint.

After a multi-dimensional test and comparison, in the business-level proxy scenario, professional service providers have obvious advantages in terms of resource purity and protocol support depth. It is recommended that enterprise users choose service providers with real residential IP resources for deployment testing according to actual business traffic characteristics.